Paper detail

Fermi-GBM Observation of GRB 090717034: $χ^2$ Test Confirms Evidence of Gravitational Lensing by a Supermassive Black Hole with Million Solar Mass

Gravitational lensing of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) can provide an opportunity to probe the massive compact objects in the universe at different redshifts. We have discovered two consecutive pulses in the light curve of GRB 090717034, with the same temporal profile and different count rate, separated by a time interval, which is identified as gravitationally lensed candidate in Fermi/GBM GRB catalogue \citep{Kalantari}. Here, we use the $χ^2$ method to investigate the similarity of the temporal profile variability of the two pulses as a gravitationally lensed candidate GRB. We find the magnification factor and the time delay between two pulses to correspond to minimising the $χ^2$ function. Then, we perform a Monte Carlo simulation on a sample of mock lensed GRBs and compare the $χ^2$ of the lensed GRB candidate with the simulation, which confirms this candidate with $1σ$ confidence level. Assuming that GRB 090717034 is lensed by a point-like object, the redshifted lens mass is about $M_L(1+z)=(4.220\pm 6.615) \times 10^6 M_{\odot}$. The lens of this GRB is a candidate for a super-massive black hole along the line of sight to the GRB.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.