Paper detail

Fermat test with gaussian base and Gaussian pseudoprimes

The structure of the group $(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})^\star$ and Fermat's little theorem are the basis for some of best-known primality testing algorithms. Many related concepts arise: Euler's totient function and Carmichael's lambda function, Fermat pseudoprimes, Carmichael and cyclic numbers, Lehmer's totient problem, Giuga's conjecture, etc. In this paper, we present and study analogues to some of the previous concepts arising when we consider the underlying group $\mathcal{G}_n:=\{a+bi\in\mathbb{Z}[i]/n\mathbb{Z}[i] : a^2+b^2\equiv 1\ \textrm{$\pmod n$}\}$. In particular we characterize Gaussian Carmichael numbers via a Korselt's criterion and we present their relation with Gaussian cyclic numbers. Finally, we present the relation between Gaussian Carmichael number and 1-Williams numbers for numbers $n \equiv 3 \pmod{4}$. There are also no known composite numbers less than $10^{18}$ in this family that are both pseudoprime to base $1+2i$ and 2-pseudoprime.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.