Paper detail

Feferman-Vaught Decompositions for Prefix Classes of First Order Logic

The Feferman-Vaught theorem provides a way of evaluating a first order sentence $φ$ on a disjoint union of structures by producing a decomposition of $φ$ into sentences which can be evaluated on the individual structures and the results of these evaluations combined using a propositional formula. This decomposition can in general be non-elementarily larger than $φ$. We show that for first order sentences in prenex normal form with a fixed number of quantifier alternations, such a decomposition, further with the same number of quantifier alternations, can be obtained in time elementary in the size of $φ$. We obtain this result as a consequence of a more general decomposition theorem that we prove for a family of infinitary logics we define. We extend these results by considering binary operations other than disjoint union, in particular sum-like operations such as ordered sum and NLC-sum, that are definable using quantifier-free interpretations.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.