Paper detail

Feedback from the IR Background in the Early Universe

It is commonly believed that the earliest stages of star-formation in the Universe were self-regulated by global radiation backgrounds - either by the ultraviolet Lyman-Werner (LW) photons emitted by the first stars (directly photodissociating H_2), or by the X-rays produced by accretion onto the black hole (BH) remnants of these stars (heating the gas but catalyzing H_2 formation). Recent studies have suggested that a significant fraction of the first stars may have had low masses (a few M_sun). Such stars do not leave BH remnants and they have softer spectra, with copious infrared (IR) radiation at photon energies around 1eV. Similar to LW and X-ray photons, these photons have a mean-free path comparable to the Hubble distance, building up an early IR background. Here we show that if soft-spectrum stars, with masses of a few M_sun, contributed more than 1% of the UV background (or their mass fraction exceeded 90%), then their IR radiation dominated radiative feedback in the early Universe. The feedback is different from the UV feedback from high-mass stars, and occurs through the photo-detachment of H^- ions, necessary for efficient H_2 formation. Nevertheless, we find that the baryon fraction which must be incorporated into low-mass stars in order to suppress H_2-cooling is only a factor of few higher than for high-mass stars.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.