Paper detail

Feedback from supercritical disk accretion flows; Two-dimensional radiation-hydrodynamic simulations of stable and unstable disks with radiatively driven outflows

The supercritical disk accretion flow with radiatively driven outflows is studied based on two-dimensional radiation-hydrodynamic simulations for a wide range of the mass input rate, $\dot{M}_{\rm input}$, which is the mass supplied from the outer region to the disk per unit time. The $α$-prescription is adopted for the viscosity. We employ $α=0.5$, as well as $α=0.1$ for $\dot{M}_{\rm input}\ge 3\times 10^2L_{\rm E}/c^2$ and only $α=0.5$ for $\dot{M}_{\rm input}\le 10^2L_{\rm E}/c^2$, where $L_{\rm E}$ is the Eddington luminosity and $c$ is the speed of light. The quasi-steady disk and radiately driven outflows form in the case in which the mass input rate highly exceeds the critical rate, $\dot{M}_{\rm input}>3\times 10^2 L_{\rm E}/c^2$. Then, the disk luminosity as well as the kinetic energy output rate by the outflow exceeds the Eddington luminosity. The moderately supercritical disk, $\dot{M}_{\rm input}\sim 10-10^2 L_{\rm E}/c^2$, exhibits limit-cycle oscillations. The disk luminosity goes up and down across the Eddington luminosity, and the radiatively driven outflows intermittently appear. The time averaged mass, momentum, and kinetic energy output rates by the outflow as well as the disk luminosity increase with increase of the mass input rate, $\propto \dot{M}_{\rm input}^{0.7-1.0}$ for $α=0.5$ and $\propto \dot{M}_{\rm input}^{0.4-0.6}$ for $α=0.1$. Our numerical simulations show that the radiatively driven outflow model for the correlation between black hole mass and bulge velocity dispersion proposed by \citeauthor{SR98} and \citeauthor{King03} is successful if $\dot{M}_{\rm input}c^2/L_{\rm E} \sim$ a few 10 ($α=0.5$) or $\gsim$ a few ($α=0.1$).

preprint2007arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.