Paper detail

Feedback Clustering for Online Travel Agencies Searches: a Case Study

Understanding choices performed by online customers is a growing need in the travel industry. In many practical situations, the only available information is the flight search query performed by the customer with no additional profile knowledge. In general, customer flight bookings are driven by prices, duration, number of connections, and so on. However, not all customers might assign the same importance to each of those criteria. Here comes the need of grouping together all flight searches performed by the same kind of customer, that is having the same booking criteria. The effectiveness of some set of recommendations, for a single cluster, can be measured in terms of the number of bookings historically performed. This effectiveness measure plays the role of a feedback, that is an external knowledge which can be recombined to iteratively obtain a final segmentation. In this paper, we describe our Online Travel Agencies (OTA) flight search use case and highlight its specific features. We address the flight search segmentation problem motivated above by proposing a novel algorithm called Split-or-Merge (S/M). This algorithm is a variation of the Split-Merge-Evolve (SME) method. The SME method has already been introduced in the community as an iterative process updating a clustering given by the K-means algorithm by splitting and merging clusters subject to feedback independent evaluations. No previous application of the SME method to the real-word data is reported in literature to the best of our knowledge. Here, we provide experimental evaluations over real-world data to the SME and the S/M methods. The impact on our domain-specific metrics obtained under the SME and the S/M methods suggests that feedback clustering techniques can be very promising in the handling of the domain of OTA flight searches.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.