Paper detail

Features of a high school olympiad problem

This paper is a supplement to a talk for mathematics teachers given at the 2016 LSU Mathematics Contest for High School Students. The paper covers more details and aspects than could be covered in the talk. We start with an interesting problem from the 2009 Iberoamerican Math Olympiad concerning a particular sequence. We include a solution to the problem, but also relate it to several areas of mathematics. This problem demonstrates the countability of the rational numbers with a direct one-to-one correspondence. The problem also shows the one-to-one correspondence of finite continued fractions and rational numbers. The subsequence of odd indexed terms was constructed by Johannes Kepler and is discussed. We also show that the indices have an extension to the 2-adic integers giving a one-to-one correspondence between the positive real numbers and the 2-adic integers. Everything but the extension to the 2-adic integers is known to have appeared elsewhere.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.