Paper detail

Feature Location Benchmark for Decomposing and Reusing Android Apps

Software reuse enables developers to reuse architecture, programs and other software artifacts. Realizing a systematical reuse in software brings a large amount of benefits for stakeholders, including lower maintenance efforts, lower development costs, and time to market. Unfortunately, currently implementing a framework for large-scale software reuse in Android apps is still a huge problem, regarding the complexity of the task and lacking of practical technical support from either tools or domain experts. Therefore, proposing a feature location benchmark for apps will help developers either optimize their feature location techniques or reuse the assets created in the benchmark for reusing. In this paper, we release a feature location benchmark, which can be used for those developers, who intend to compose software product lines (SPL) and release reuse in apps. The benchmark not only contributes to the research community for reuse research, but also helps participants in industry for optimizing their architecture and enhancing modularity. In addition, we also develop an Android Studio plugin named caIDE for developers to view and operate on the benchmark.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.