Paper detail

FEAT: Fair Coordinated Iterative Water-Filling Algorithm

In this paper, we consider a perfect coordinated water-filling game, where each user transmits solely on a given carrier. The main goal of the proposed algorithm (which we call FEAT) is to get close to the optimal, while keeping a decent level of fairness. The key idea within FEAT is to minimize the ratio between the best and the worst utilities of the users. This is done by ensuring that, at each iteration (channel assignment), a user is satisfied with this assignment as long as he does not loose much more than other users in the system. It has been shown that FEAT outperforms most related algorithms in many aspects, especially in interference-limited systems. Indeed, with FEAT we can ensure a near-optimal, fair and energy efficient solution with low computational complexity. In terms of robustness, it turns out that the balance between being nearly globally optimal and good from individual point of view seems hard to sustain with a significant number of users. Also notice that, in this regard, global optimality gets less affected than the individual one, which offers hope that such an accurate water-filling algorithm can be designed around competition in interference-limited systems.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.