Paper detail

Feasibility Study of $D_s^+ \to τ^+ ν_τ$ Decay and Test of Lepton Flavor Universality with Leptonic $D_s^+$ Decays at STCF

We report a sensitive study of $D_s^+ \to τ^+ ν_τ$ decay via $τ^+ \to e^+ ν_e \barν_τ$ with an integrated luminosity of 1 ab$^{-1}$ at the center-of-mass energy of $4.009$ GeV at a future Super Tau Charm Facility (STCF). Under the help of the fast simulation software package, the statistical sensitivity for the absolute branching fraction of $D_s^+ \to τ^+ ν_τ$ is determined to be $2\times10^{-4}$. Combining with our previous prospect of $D_s^+ \to μ^+ ν_μ$, the ratio of the branching fractions for $D_s^+ \to τ^+ ν_τ$ over $D_s^+ \to μ^+ ν_μ$ can achieve a relative statistical precision of 0.5%, which will provide the most stringent test of the $τ$-$μ$ lepton flavor universality in heavy quark decays. Taking the decay constant $f_{D_s^+}$ from lattice QCD calculations or the CKM matrix element $|V_{cs}|$ from the CKMfitter group as an input, the relative statistical uncertainties for $|V_{cs}|$ and $f_{D_s^+}$ are estimated to be 0.3% and 0.2%, respectively.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.