Paper detail

Fe Line Diagnostics of Cataclysmic Variables and Galactic Ridge X-ray Emission

The properties of the Galactic Ridge X-ray Emission (GRXE) observed in the 2-10 keV band place fundamental constraints on various types of X-ray sources in the Milky Way. Although the primarily discrete origin of the emission is now well established, the responsible populations of these sources remain uncertain, especially at relatively low fluxes. To provide insights into this issue, we systematically characterize the Fe emission line properties of the candidate types of the sources in the solar neighborhood and compare them with those measured for the GRXE. Our source sample includes 6 symbiotic stars (SSs), 16 intermediate polars (IPs), 3 polars, 16 quiescent dwarf novae (DNe) and 4 active binaries (ABs). We find that the mean equivalent width ($EW_{6.7}$) of the 6.7-keV line and the mean 7.0/6.7-keV line ratio are $107\pm16.0$ eV and $0.71\pm 0.04$ for intermediate polars and $221\pm 135$ eV and $0.44\pm 0.14$ for polars, respectively, which are all substantially different from those ($490\pm15 $~eV and $0.2\pm 0.08$) for the GRXE. Instead, the GRXE values are better agreed by the $EW_{6.7}$ ($438\pm 84.6$~eV) and the ratio ($0.27\pm 0.06$) observed for the DNe. We further find that the $EW_{6.7}$ is strongly correlated with the 2-10-keV luminosity of the DNe, which can be characterized by the relation $EW_{6.7}=(438\pm95 {\rm~eV}) (L/10^{31}~{\rm~ergs~s^{-1} })^{(-0.31\pm0.15)}$. Accounting for this correlation, the agreement can be improved further, especially when the contributions from other classes sources to the GRXE are considered, which all have low $EW_{6.7}$ values. We conclude that the GRXE mostly consists of typically faint, but numerous DNe, plus ABs, while magnetic CVs are probably mainly the high-flux representatives of the responsible populations and dominate the GRXE only in harder energy bands.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.