Paper detail

Fe-C and Fe-H systems at pressures of the Earth's inner core

The solid inner core of the Earth is predominantly composed of iron alloyed with several percent Ni and some lighter elements, Si, S, O, H, and C being the prime candidates. There have been a growing number of papers investigating C and H as possible light elements in the core, but the results are contradictory. Here, using ab initio simulations, we study the Fe-C and Fe-H systems at inner core pressures (330-364 GPa). Using the evolutionary structure prediction algorithm USPEX, we have determined the lowest-enthalpy structures of possible carbides (FeC, Fe2C, Fe3C, Fe4C, FeC2, FeC3, FeC4 and Fe7C3) and hydrides (Fe4H, Fe3H, Fe2H, FeH, FeH2, FeH3, FeH4) and have found that Fe2C (Pnma) is the most stable iron carbide at pressures of the inner core, while FeH, FeH3 and FeH4 are stable iron hydrides at these conditions. For Fe3C, the cementite structure (Pnma) and the Cmcm structure recently found by random sampling are less stable than the I-4 and C2/m structures found here. We found that FeH3 and FeH4 adopt chemically interesting thermodynamically stable structures, in both compounds containing trivalent iron. The density of the inner core can be matched with a reasonable concentration of carbon, 11-15 mol.percent (2.6-3.7 wt.percent) at relevant pressures and temperatures. This concentration matches that in CI carbonaceous chondrites and corresponds to the average atomic mass in the range 49.3-51.0, in close agreement with inferences from the Birch's law for the inner core. Similarly made estimates for the maximum hydrogen content are unrealistically high, 17-22 mol.percent (0.4-0.5 wt.percent), which corresponds to the average atomic mass in the range 43.8-46.5. We conclude that carbon is a better candidate light alloying element than hydrogen.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.