Paper detail

FaVAD: A software workflow for characterisation and visualizing of defects in crystalline structures

The analysis of defects and defect dynamics in crystalline materials is important for fundamental science and for a wide range of applied engineering. With increasing system size the analysis of molecular-dynamics simulation data becomes non-trivial. Here, we present a workflow for semi-automatic identification and classification of defects in crystalline structures, combining a new approach for defect description with several already existing open-source software packages. Our approach addresses the key challenges posed by the often relatively tiny volume fraction of the modified parts of the sample, thermal motion and the presence of potentially unforeseen atomic configurations (defect types) after irradiation. The local environment of any atom is converted into a rotation-invariant descriptive vector ('fingerprint'), which can be compared to known defect types and also yields a distance metric suited for classification. Vectors which cannot be associated to known structures indicate new types of defects. As proof-of-concept we apply our method on an iron sample to analyze the defects caused by a collision cascade induced by a 10 keV primary-knock-on-atom. The obtained results are in good agreement with reported literature values.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.