Paper detail

Fate of density functional theory in high-pressure solid hydrogen

This paper investigates some of the successes and failures of density functional theory in the study of high-pressure solid hydrogen at low temperature. We calculate the phase diagram, metallization pressure, phonon spectrum, and proton zero-point energy using three popular exchange-correlation functionals: the local density approximation (LDA), the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) generalized gradient approximation, and the semi-local Becke-Lee-Yang-Parr (BLYP) functional. We focus on the solid molecular P$6_3$/m, C2/c, Cmca-12, and Cmca structures in the pressure range from $100<P<500$ GPa over which phases I, II and III are observed experimentally. At the static level of theory, in which proton zero-point energy is ignored, the LDA, PBE and BLYP functionals give very different structural transition and metallization pressures, with the BLYP phase diagram in better agreement with experiment. Nevertheless, all three functionals provide qualitatively the same information about the band gaps of the four structures and the phase transitions between them. Going beyond the static level, we find that the frequencies of the vibron modes observed above 3000 cm$^{-1}$ depend strongly on the choice of exchange-correlation functional, although the low-frequency part of the phonon spectrum is little affected. The largest and smallest values of the proton zero-point energy, obtained using the BLYP and LDA functionals, respectively, differ by more than 10 meV/proton. Including the proton zero-point energy calculated from the phonon spectrum within the harmonic approximation improves the agreement of the BLYP and PBE phase diagrams with experiment. Taken as a whole, our results demonstrate the inadequacy of mean-field-like density functional calculations of solid molecular hydrogen in phases I, II and III and emphasize the need for more sophisticated methods.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.