Paper detail

FAT-PIM: Low-Cost Error Detection for Processing-In-Memory

Processing In Memory (PIM) accelerators are promising architecture that can provide massive parallelization and high efficiency in various applications. Such architectures can instantaneously provide ultra-fast operation over extensive data, allowing real-time performance in data-intensive workloads. For instance, Resistive Memory (ReRAM) based PIM architectures are widely known for their inherent dot-product computation capability. While the performance of such architecture is essential, reliability and accuracy are also important, especially in mission-critical real-time systems. Unfortunately, the PIM architectures have a fundamental limitation in guaranteeing error-free operation. As a result, current methods must pay high implementation costs or performance penalties to achieve reliable execution in the PIM accelerator. In this paper, we make a fundamental observation of this reliability limitation of ReRAM based PIM architecture. Accordingly, we propose a novel solution--Falut Tolerant PIM or FAT-PIM, that can improve reliability for such systems significantly at a low cost. Our evaluation shows that we can improve the error tolerance significantly with only 4.9% performance cost and 3.9% storage overhead.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.