Paper detail

Faster algorithms for counting subgraphs in sparse graphs

Given a $k$-node pattern graph $H$ and an $n$-node host graph $G$, the subgraph counting problem asks to compute the number of copies of $H$ in $G$. In this work we address the following question: can we count the copies of $H$ faster if $G$ is sparse? We answer in the affirmative by introducing a novel tree-like decomposition for directed acyclic graphs, inspired by the classic tree decomposition for undirected graphs. This decomposition gives a dynamic program for counting the homomorphisms of $H$ in $G$ by exploiting the degeneracy of $G$, which allows us to beat the state-of-the-art subgraph counting algorithms when $G$ is sparse enough. For example, we can count the induced copies of any $k$-node pattern $H$ in time $2^{O(k^2)} O(n^{0.25k + 2} \log n)$ if $G$ has bounded degeneracy, and in time $2^{O(k^2)} O(n^{0.625k + 1} \log n)$ if $G$ has bounded average degree. These bounds are instantiations of a more general result, parameterized by the degeneracy of $G$ and the structure of $H$, which generalizes classic bounds on counting cliques and complete bipartite graphs. We also give lower bounds based on the Exponential Time Hypothesis, showing that our results are actually a characterization of the complexity of subgraph counting in bounded-degeneracy graphs.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.