Paper detail

Fast sampling for Bayesian inference in neural circuits

Time is at a premium for recurrent network dynamics, and particularly so when they are stochastic and correlated: the quality of inference from such dynamics fundamentally depends on how fast the neural circuit generates new samples from its stationary distribution. Indeed, behavioral decisions can occur on fast time scales (~100 ms), but it is unclear what neural circuit dynamics afford sampling at such high rates. We analyzed a stochastic form of rate-based linear neuronal network dynamics with synaptic weight matrix $W$, and the dependence on $W$ of the covariance of the stationary distribution of joint firing rates. This covariance $Σ$ can be actively used to represent posterior uncertainty via sampling under a linear-Gaussian latent variable model. The key insight is that the mapping between $W$ and $Σ$ is degenerate: there are infinitely many $W$'s that lead to sampling from the same $Σ$ but differ greatly in the speed at which they sample. We were able to explicitly separate these extra degrees of freedom in a parametric form and thus study their effects on sampling speed. We show that previous proposals for probabilistic sampling in neural circuits correspond to using a symmetric $W$ which violates Dale's law and results in critically slow sampling, even for moderate stationary correlations. In contrast, optimizing network dynamics for speed consistently yielded asymmetric $W$'s and dynamics characterized by fast transients, such that samples of network activity became fully decorrelated over ~10 ms. Importantly, networks with separate excitatory/inhibitory populations proved to be particularly efficient samplers, and were in the balanced regime. Thus, plausible neural circuit dynamics can perform fast sampling for efficient decoding and inference.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.