Paper detail

Fast radio bursts as probes of feedback from active galactic nuclei

Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are a promising tool for studying the low-density universe as their dispersion measures (DM) are extremely sensitive probes of electron column density. Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) inject energy into the intergalactic medium, affecting the DM and its scatter. To determine the effectiveness of FRBs as a probe of AGN feedback, we analysed three different AGN models from the EAGLE simulation series. We measured the mean DM-redshift relation, and the scatter around it, using $2.56 \times 10^8$ sightlines at 131 redshift ($z$) bins between $0 \leq z \leq 3$. While the DM-redshift relation itself is highly robust against different AGN feedback models, significant differences are detected in the scatter around the mean: weaker feedback leads to more scatter. We find $\sim 10^4$ localised FRBs are needed to discriminate between the scatter in standard feedback and stronger, more intermittent feedback models. The number of FRBs required is dependent on the redshift distribution of the detected population. A log-normal redshift distribution at $z=0.5$ requires approximately 50% fewer localised FRBs than a distribution centred at $z=1$. With the Square Kilometre Array expected to detect $>10^3$ FRBs per day, in the future, FRBs will be able to provide constraints on AGN feedback.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.