Paper detail

Fast numerical method to generate halo catalogs in modified gravity (part I): second-order Lagrangian Perturbation Theory

We present and test a new numerical method to determine second-order Lagrangian displacement fields in the context of modified gravity (MG) theories. We start from the extension of Lagrangian Perturbation Theory to a class of MG models that can be described by a parametrized Poisson equation, with the introduction of a scale-dependent function. We exploit fast Fourier transforms to compute the full source term of the differential equation for the second-order Lagrangian displacement field. We compare its mean to the source term computed for specific configurations for which a k-dependent solution can be found numerically. We choose the configuration that best matches the full source term, thus obtaining an approximate factorization of the second-order displacement field as the space term valid for standard gravity times a k-dependent, second-order growth factor $D_2(k,t)$. This approximation is used to compute second order displacements for particles. The method is tested against N-body simulations run with standard and $f(R)$ gravity: we rely on the results of a friends-of-friends code run on the N-body snapshots to assign particles to halos, then compute the halo power spectrum. We find very consistent results for the two gravity theories: second-order LPT (2LPT) allows to recover the halo power spectrum of N-body simulations within $\sim 10\%$ precision to $k\sim 0.2-0.4\ h\ {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$, as well as halo positions, with an error that is a fraction of the inter-particle distance. We show that, when considering the same level of non-linearity in the density field, the performance of 2LPT with MG is the same (within $1\%$) as the one obtained for the standard $Λ$CDM model with General Relativity. When implemented in a computer code, this formulation of 2LPT can quickly generate dark matter distributions with $f(R)$ gravity, and can easily be extended to other MG theories.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.