Paper detail

Fast Isomorphism Testing of Graphs with Regularly-Connected Components

The Graph Isomorphism problem has both theoretical and practical interest. In this paper we present an algorithm, called conauto-1.2, that efficiently tests whether two graphs are isomorphic, and finds an isomorphism if they are. This algorithm is an improved version of the algorithm conauto, which has been shown to be very fast for random graphs and several families of hard graphs. In this paper we establish a new theorem that allows, at very low cost, the easy discovery of many automorphisms. This result is especially suited for graphs with regularly connected components, and can be applied in any isomorphism testing and canonical labeling algorithm to drastically improve its performance. In particular, algorithm conauto-1.2 is obtained by the application of this result to conauto. The resulting algorithm preserves all the nice features of conauto, but drastically improves the testing of graphs with regularly connected components. We run extensive experiments, which show that the most popular algorithms (namely, nauty and bliss) can not compete with conauto-1.2 for these graph families.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.