Paper detail

Fast infrared variability from the black-hole candidate MAXI J1535$-$571 and tight constraints on the modelling

We present the results regarding the analysis of the fast X-ray/infrared (IR) variability of the black-hole transient MAXI J1535$-$571. The data studied in this work consist of two strictly simultaneous observations performed with XMM-Newton (X-rays: 0.7$-$10 keV), VLT/HAWK-I ($K_{\rm s}$ band, 2.2 $μ$m) and VLT/VISIR ($M$ and $PAH2$_$2$ bands, 4.85 and 11.88 $μ$m respectively). The cross-correlation function between the X-ray and near-IR light curves shows a strong asymmetric anti-correlation dip at positive lags. We detect a near-IR QPO (2.5 $σ$) at $2.07\pm0.09$ Hz simultaneously with an X-ray QPO at approximately the same frequency ($f_0=2.25\pm0.05$). From the cross-spectral analysis a lag consistent with zero was measured between the two oscillations. We also measure a significant correlation between the average near-IR and mid-IR fluxes during the second night, but find no correlation on short timescales. We discuss these results in terms of the two main scenarios for fast IR variability (hot inflow and jet powered by internal shocks). In both cases, our preliminary modelling suggests the presence of a misalignment between disk and jet.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.