Paper detail

Fast Incremental and Personalized PageRank

In this paper, we analyze the efficiency of Monte Carlo methods for incremental computation of PageRank, personalized PageRank, and similar random walk based methods (with focus on SALSA), on large-scale dynamically evolving social networks. We assume that the graph of friendships is stored in distributed shared memory, as is the case for large social networks such as Twitter. For global PageRank, we assume that the social network has $n$ nodes, and $m$ adversarially chosen edges arrive in a random order. We show that with a reset probability of $ε$, the total work needed to maintain an accurate estimate (using the Monte Carlo method) of the PageRank of every node at all times is $O(\frac{n\ln m}{ε^{2}})$. This is significantly better than all known bounds for incremental PageRank. For instance, if we naively recompute the PageRanks as each edge arrives, the simple power iteration method needs $Ω(\frac{m^2}{\ln(1/(1-ε))})$ total time and the Monte Carlo method needs $O(mn/ε)$ total time; both are prohibitively expensive. Furthermore, we also show that we can handle deletions equally efficiently. We then study the computation of the top $k$ personalized PageRanks starting from a seed node, assuming that personalized PageRanks follow a power-law with exponent $α< 1$. We show that if we store $R>q\ln n$ random walks starting from every node for large enough constant $q$ (using the approach outlined for global PageRank), then the expected number of calls made to the distributed social network database is $O(k/(R^{(1-α)/α}))$. We also present experimental results from the social networking site, Twitter, verifying our assumptions and analyses. The overall result is that this algorithm is fast enough for real-time queries over a dynamic social network.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.