Paper detail

Fast Free-text Authentication via Instance-based Keystroke Dynamics

Keystroke dynamics study the way in which users input text via their keyboards. Having the ability to differentiate users, typing behaviors can unobtrusively form a component of a behavioral biometric recognition system to improve existing account security. Keystroke dynamics systems on free-text data have previously required 500 or more characters to achieve reasonable performance. In this paper, we propose a novel instance-based graph comparison algorithm called the instance-based tail area density (ITAD) metric to reduce the number of keystrokes required to authenticate users. Additionally, commonly used features in the keystroke dynamics literature, such as monographs and digraphs, are all found to be useful in informing who is typing. The usefulness of these features for authentication is determined using a random forest classifier and validated across two publicly available datasets. Scores from the individual features are fused to form a single matching score. With the fused matching score and our ITAD metric, we achieve equal error rates (EERs) for 100 and 200 testing digraphs of 9.7% and 7.8% for the Clarkson II dataset, improving upon state-of-the-art of 35.3% and 15.3%.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.