Paper detail

Fast evolving size of early-type galaxies at z>2 and the role of dissipationless (dry) merging

We present the analysis of a large sample of early-type galaxies (ETGs) at 0<z<3 aimed at tracing the cosmic evolution of their size and compare it with a model of pure dissipationless (dry) merging in the LambdaCDM framework. The effective radius R_e depends on stellar mass M as R_e(M) \propto M}^{alpha} with alpha ~ 0.5 at all redshifts. The redshift evolution of the mass- or SDSS-normalized size can be reproduced as \propto (1+z)^beta with beta ~ -1, with the most massive ETGs possibly showing the fastest evolutionary rate (beta ~ -1.4). This size evolution slows down significantly to beta ~ -0.6 if the ETGs at z>2 are removed from the sample, suggesting an accelerated increase of the typical sizes at z>2, especially for the ETGs with the largest masses. A pure dry merging LambdaCDM model is marginally consistent with the average size evolution at 0<z<1.7, but predicts descendants too compact for z>2 progenitor ETGs. This opens the crucial question on what physical mechanism can explain the accelerated evolution at z>2, or whether an unclear observational bias is partly responsible for that.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.