Paper detail

Fast cooling synchrotron radiation in a decaying magnetic field and $γ$-ray burst emission mechanism

Synchrotron radiation of relativistic electrons is an important radiation mechanism in many astrophysical sources. In the sources where the synchrotron cooling time scale $t_c$ is shorter than the dynamical time scale $t_{dyn}$, electrons are cooled down below the minimum injection energy. It has been believed that such "fast cooling" electrons have an energy distribution $dN_e /dγ_e \propto γ_e^{-2}$, and their synchrotron radiation flux density has a spectral shape $F_ν\propto ν^{-1/2}$. On the other hand, in a transient expanding astrophysical source, such as a gamma-ray burst (GRB), the magnetic field strength in the emission region continuously decreases with radius. Here we study such a system, and find that in a certain parameter regime, the fast cooling electrons can have a harder energy spectrum, and the standard $d N_e / d γ_e \propto γ_e^{-2}$ spectrum is achieved only in the deep fast cooling regime when $t_c \ll t_{dyn}$. We apply this new physical regime to GRBs, and suggest that the GRB prompt emission spectra whose low-energy photon index $α$ has a typical value -1 could be due to synchrotron radiation in this moderately fast cooling regime.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.