Paper detail

Fast approximate delivery of fluence maps: the single map case

In this first paper of a two-paper series, we present a method for optimizing the dynamic delivery of fluence maps in radiation therapy. For a given fluence map and a given delivery time, the optimization of the leaf trajectories of a multi-leaf collimator to approximately form the given fluence map is a non-convex optimization problem. Its general solution has not been addressed in the literature, despite the fact that dynamic delivery of fluence maps has long been a common approach to intensity modulated radiation therapy. We model the leaf trajectory and dose rate optimization as a non-convex continuous optimization problem and solve it by an interior point method from randomly initialized feasible starting solutions. We demonstrate the method on a fluence map from a prostate case and a larger fluence map from a head-and-neck case. While useful for static beam IMRT delivery, our main motivation for this work is the extension to the case of sequential fluence map delivery, i.e. the case of VMAT, which is the topic of the second paper.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.