Paper detail

Fast and accurate predictions of covalent bonds in chemical space

We assess the predictive accuracy of perturbation theory based estimates of changes in covalent bonding due to linear alchemical interpolations among molecules. We have investigated $σ$ bonding to hydrogen, as well as $σ$ and $π$ bonding between main-group elements, occurring in small sets of iso-valence-electronic molecular species with elements drawn from second to fourth rows in the $p$-block of the periodic table. Numerical evidence suggests that first order estimates of covalent bonding potentials can achieve chemical accuracy if (i) the alchemical interpolation is vertical (fixed geometry), (ii) involves molecules containing elements in the third and fourth row of the periodic table, and (iii) a reference geometry is optimized. In this case, changes in the bonding potential become near-linear in coupling parameter, resulting in analytical predictions with very high accuracy ($\sim$1 kcal/mol). Second order estimates deteriorate the prediction. If initial and final molecules differ not only in composition but also in geometry, all estimates become substantially worse, with second order being slightly more accurate than first order. The independent particle approximation to the second order perturbation performs poorly when compared to the coupled perturbed or finite difference approach. Taylor series expansions up to fourth order of the potential energy curve of highly symmetric systems indicate a finite radius of convergence, as illustrated for the alchemical stretching of H$_2^+$. Numerical results are presented for covalent bonds to hydrogen in 12 molecules with 8 valence electrons; (ii) main-group single bonds in 9 molecules with 14 valence electrons; (iii) main-group double bonds in 9 molecules with 12 valence electrons; (iv) main-group triple bonds in 9 molecules with 10 valence electrons; (v) H$_2^+$ single bond with 1 electron.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.