Paper detail

Families with no perfect matchings

We consider families of $k$-subsets of $\{1, \dots, n\}$, where $n$ is a multiple of $k$, which have no perfect matching. An equivalent condition for a family $\mathcal{F}$ to have no perfect matching is for there to be a blocking set, which is a set of $b$ elements of $\{1, \dots, n\}$ that cannot be covered by $b$ disjoint sets in $\mathcal{F}$. We are specifically interested in the largest possible size of a family $\mathcal{F}$ with no perfect matching and no blocking set of size less than $b$. Frankl resolved the case of families with no singleton blocking set (in other words, the $b=2$ case) for sufficiently large $n$ and conjectured an optimal construction for general $b$. Though Frankl's construction fails to be optimal for $k = 2, 3$, we show that the construction is optimal whenever $k \ge 100$ and $n$ is sufficiently large.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.