Paper detail

Families of well approximable measures

We provide an algorithm to approximate a finitely supported discrete measure $μ$ by a measure $ν_{N}$ corresponding to a set of $N$ points so that the total variation between $μ$ and $ν_N$ has an upper bound. As a consequence if $μ$ is a (finite or infinitely supported) discrete probability measure on $[0,1]^{d}$ with a sufficient decay rate on the weights of each point, then $μ$ can be approximated by $ν_N$ with total variation, and hence star-discrepancy, bounded above by $(\log N) N^{-1}$. Our result improves, in the discrete case, recent work by Aistleitner, Bilyk, and Nikolov who show that for any normalized Borel measure $μ$, there exist finite sets whose star-discrepancy with respect to $μ$ is at most $(\log N)^{d-\frac{1}{2}} N^{-1}$. Moreover we close a gap in the literature for discrepancy in the case $d=1$ showing both that Lebesgue is indeed the hardest measure to approximate by finite sets and also that all measures without discrete components have the same order of discrepancy as the Lebesgue measure.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.