Paper detail

Families of polytopal digraphs that do not satisfy the shelling property

A polytopal digraph $G(P)$ is an orientation of the skeleton of a convex polytope $P$. The possible non-degenerate pivot operations of the simplex method in solving a linear program over $P$ can be represented as a special polytopal digraph known as an LP digraph. Presently there is no general characterization of which polytopal digraphs are LP digraphs, although four necessary properties are known: acyclicity, unique sink orientation(USO), the Holt-Klee property and the shelling property. The shelling property was introduced by Avis and Moriyama (2009), where two examples are given in $d=4$ dimensions of polytopal digraphs satisfying the first three properties but not the shelling property. The smaller of these examples has $n=7$ vertices. Avis, Miyata and Moriyama(2009) constructed for each $d \ge 4$ and $n \ge d+2$, a $d$-polytope $P$ with $n$ vertices which has a polytopal digraph which is an acyclic USO that satisfies the Holt-Klee property, but does not satisfy the shelling property. The construction was based on a minimal such example, which has $d=4$ and $n=6$. In this paper we explore the shelling condition further. First we give an apparently stronger definition of the shelling property, which we then prove is equivalent to the original definition. Using this stronger condition we are able to give a more general construction of such families. In particular, we show that given any 4-dimensional polytope $P$ with $n_0$ vertices whose unique sink is simple, we can extend $P$ for any $d \ge 4$ and $n \ge n_0 + d-4$ to a $d$-polytope with these properties that has $n$ vertices. Finally we investigate the strength of the shelling condition for $d$-crosspolytopes, for which Develin (2004) has given a complete characterization of LP orientations.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.