Paper detail

Fake star formation bursts: blue horizontal branch stars masquerade as young stars in optical integrated light spectroscopy

Model color magnitude diagrams of low-metallicity globular clusters usually show a deficit of hot evolved stars with respect to observations. We investigate quantitatively the impact of such modelling inaccuracies on the significance of star formation history reconstructions obtained from optical integrated spectra. To do so, we analyse the sample of spectra of galactic globular clusters of Schiavon et al. with STECKMAP (Ocvirk et al.) and the stellar population models Vazdekis et al. and Bruzual & Charlot, and focus on the reconstructed stellar age distributions. Firstly, we show that background/foreground contamination correlates with E(B-V), which allows us to define a clean subsample of uncontaminated GCs, on the basis of a E(B-V) filtering. We then identify a "confusion zone" where fake young bursts of star formation pop up in the star formation history although the observed population is genuinely old. These artifacts appear for 70-100% of cases depending on the population model used, and contribute up to 12% of the light in the optical. Their correlation with the horizontal branch ratio indicates that the confusion is driven by HB morphology: red horizontal branch clusters are well fitted by old stellar population models while those with a blue HB require an additional hot component. The confusion zone extends over [Fe/H]=[-2,-1.2], although we lack the data to probe extreme high and low metallicity regimes. As a consequence, any young starburst superimposed on an old stellar population in this metallicity range could be regarded as a modeling artifact, if it weighs less than 12% of the optical light, and if no emission lines typical of an HII region are present.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.