Paper detail

Fake evolution of dark energy from observation data

The equation of state (EOS) of the dark energy is the key parameter to study the nature of the dark energy from the observation. Though the dark energy is found to be well consistent with the cosmological constant with a constant EOS of $-1$, weak evidences from different observation data and analyses show that dark energy models with an evolving EOS slightly less than $-1$ at some medium redshifts and greater than $-1$ at high redshifts are more favored. In this paper, It is shown that how such a pattern of an evolving dark energy EOS can be just biases arising from the statistical method widely adopted in data analyses together with the dependence of the cosmic expansion on the dark energy EOS. The issue is actually not limited to dark energy or cosmology. It represents a class of mathematical problems of Bayesian analysis. It should be paid attention to in similar data analyses to avoid biases in drawing conclusions.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.