Paper detail

Faint Lyman-Break galaxies as a crucial test for galaxy formation models

It has recently been shown that galaxy formation models within the LambdaCDM cosmology predict that, compared to the observed population, small galaxies (with stellar masses < 10^{11} M_sun) form too early, are too passive since z ~ 3 and host too old stellar populations at z=0. We then expect an overproduction of small galaxies at z > 4 that should be visible as an excess of faint Lyman-break galaxies. To check whether this excess is present, we use the MORGANA galaxy formation model and GRASIL spectro-photometric + radiative transfer code to generate mock catalogues of deep fields observed with HST-ACS. We add observational noise and the effect of Lyman-alpha emission, and perform color-color selections to identify Lyman-break galaxies. The resulting mock candidates have plausible properties that closely resemble those of observed galaxies. We are able to reproduce the evolution of the bright tail of the luminosity function of Lyman-break galaxies (with a possible underestimate of the number of the brightest i-dropouts), but uncertainties and degeneracies in dust absorption parameters do not allow to give strong constraints to the model. Besides, our model shows a clear excess with respect to observations of faint Lyman-break galaxies, especially of z_{850} ~ 27 V-dropouts at z ~ 5. We quantify the properties of these "excess" galaxies and discuss the implications: these galaxies are hosted in dark matter halos with circular velocities in excess of 100 km s^{-1}, and their suppression may require a deep re-thinking of stellar feedback processes taking place in galaxy formation.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.