Paper detail

Faint-end Quasar Luminosity Functions from Cosmological Hydrodynamic Simulations

We investigate the predictions for the faint-end quasar luminosity function (QLF) and its evolution using fully cosmological hydrodynamic simulations which self-consistently follow star formation, black hole growth and associated feedback processes. We find remarkably good agreement between predicted and observed faint end of the optical and X-ray QLFs (the bright end is not accessible in our simulated volumes) at z < 2. At higher redshifts our simulations tend to overestimate the QLF at the faintest luminosities. We show that although the low (high) luminosity ranges of the faint-end QLF are dominated by low (high) mass black holes, a wide range of black hole masses still contributes to any given luminosity range. This is consistent with the complex lightcurves of black holes resulting from the detailed hydrodynamics followed in the simulations. Consistent with the results on the QLFs, we find good agreement for the evolution of the comoving number density (in optical, soft and hard X-ray bands) of AGN for luminosities above 10^43 erg/s. However, the luminosity density evolution from the simulation appears to imply a peak at higher redshift than constrained from hard X-ray data (but not in optical). Our predicted excess at the faintest fluxes at z >= 2 does not lead to an overestimate to the total X-ray background and its contribution is at most a factor of two larger than the unresolved fraction of the 2-8 keV background. Even though this could be explained by some yet undetected, perhaps heavily obscured faint quasar population, we show that our predictions for the faint sources at high redshifts (which are dominated by the low mass black holes) in the simulations are likely affected by resolution effects.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.