Factorization in monoids and rings

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

Let H×H^\times be the group of units of a multiplicatively written monoid HH. We say HH is acyclic if xyz≠yxyz \ne y for all x,y,z∈Hx, y, z \in H with x∉H×x \notin H^\times or z∉H×z \notin H^\times; unit-cancellative if yx≠x≠xyyx \ne x \ne xy for all x,y∈Hx, y \in H with y∉H×y \notin H^\times; f.g.u. if there is a finite set A⊆HA \subseteq H such that every non-unit of HH is a finite product of elements of the form uavuav with u,v∈H×u, v \in H^\times and a∈Aa \in A; l.f.g.u. if, for each x∈Hx \in H, the smallest divisor-closed submonoid of HH containing xx is f.g.u; and atomic if every non-unit can be written as a finite product of atoms, where an atom is a non-unit that does not factor into a product of two non-units. We generalize to l.f.g.u. or acyclic l.f.g.u. monoids a few results so far only known for unit-cancellative l.f.g.u. commutative monoids (cancellative monoids are unit-cancellative, and a commutative monoid is unit-cancellative if and only if it is acyclic). In particular, we prove the following: ∙\bullet If HH is an atomic l.f.g.u. monoid, then every non-unit has only finitely many factorizations (into atoms) that are "minimal" and "pairwise non-equivalent" (with respect to some naturally defined relations on the free monoid over the "alphabet" of atoms). ∙\bullet If HH is an acyclic l.f.g.u. monoid, then it is atomic; and moreover, each element has only finitely many "pairwise non-equivalent" factorizations if we additionally assume HH to be commutative.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.