Paper detail

Factorization Formulas for $2D$ Critical Percolation, Revisited

We consider critical site percolation on the triangular lattice in the upper half-plane. Let $u_1, u_2$ be two sites on the boundary and $w$ a site in the interior of the half-plane. It was predicted by Simmons, Kleban and Ziff in a paper from 2007 that the ratio $\mathbb{P}(nu_1 \leftrightarrow nu_2 \leftrightarrow nw)^{2}\,/\,\mathbb{P}(nu_1 \leftrightarrow nu_2)\cdot\mathbb{P}(nu_1 \leftrightarrow nw)\cdot\mathbb{P}(nu_2 \leftrightarrow nw)$ converges to $K_F$ as $n \to \infty$, where $x\leftrightarrow y$ denotes the event that $x$ and $y$ are in the same open cluster, and $K_F$ is an explicitly known constant. Beliaev and Izyurov proved in a paper in 2012 an analog of this factorization in the scaling limit. We prove, using their result and a generalized coupling argument, the earlier mentioned prediction. Furthermore we prove a factorization formula for the probability $\mathbb{P}(nu_2 \leftrightarrow [nu_1,nu_1+s];\, nw \leftrightarrow [nu_1,nu_1+s])$, where $s>0$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.