Paper detail

Factorization for Generalized Biadjoint Scalar Amplitudes via Matroid Subdivisions

We study the problem of factorization for residues of generalized biadjoint scalar scattering amplitudes $m^{(k)}_n$, introduced by Cachazo, Early, Guevara and Mizera (CEGM), involving multi-dimensional residues which factorize generically into $k$-ary products of lower-point generalized biadjoint amplitudes of the same type $m^{(k)}_{n_1}\cdots m^{(k)}_{n_k}$, where $n_1+\cdots +n_k = n+k(k-1)$, noting that smaller numbers of factors arise as special cases. Such behavior is governed geometrically by regular matroid subdivisions of hypersimplices and cones in the positive tropical Grassmannian, and combinatorially by collections of compatible decorated ordered set partitions, considered modulo cyclic rotation. We make a proposal for conditions under which this happens and we develop $k=3,4$ in detail. We conclude briefly to propose a novel formula to construct coarsest regular matroid subdivisions of all hypersimplices $Δ_{k,n}$ and rays of the positive tropical Grassmannian, which should be of independent interest.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.