Paper detail

Facing ADAS validation complexity with usage oriented testing

Validating Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) is a strategic issue, since such systems are becoming increasingly widespread in the automotive field. ADAS bring extra comfort to drivers, and this has become a selling point. But these functions, while useful, must not affect the general safety of the vehicle which is the manufacturer's responsibility. A significant number of current ADAS are based on vision systems, and applications such as obstacle detection and detection of pedestrians have become essential components of functions such as automatic emergency braking. These systems that preserve and protect road users take on even more importance with the arrival of the new Euro NCAP protocols. Therefore the robustness and reliability of ADAS functions cannot be neglected and car manufacturers need to have tools to ensure that the ADAS functions running on their vehicles operate with the utmost safety. Furthermore, the complexity of these systems in conjunction with the nearly infinite number of parameter combinations related to the usage profile of functions based on image sensors push us to think about testing optimization methods and tool standards to support the design and validation phases of ADAS systems. The resources required for the validation using current methods make them actually less and less adapted to new active safety features, which induce very strong dependability requirements. Today, to test the camera-based ADAS, test vehicles are equipped with these systems and are performing long hours of driving that can last for years. These tests are used to validate the use of the function and to verify its response to the requirements described in the specifications without considering the functional safety standard ISO26262.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.