Paper detail

Facial Reduction and SDP Methods for Systems of Polynomial Equations

The real radical ideal of a system of polynomials with finitely many complex roots is generated by a system of real polynomials having only real roots and free of multiplicities. It is a central object in computational real algebraic geometry and important as a preconditioner for numerical solvers. Lasserre and co-workers have shown that the real radical ideal of real polynomial systems with finitely many real solutions can be determined by a combination of semi-definite programming (SDP) and geometric involution techniques. A conjectured extension of such methods to positive dimensional polynomial systems has been given recently by Ma, Wang and Zhi. We show that regularity in the form of the Slater constraint qualification (strict feasibility) fails for the resulting SDP feasibility problems. Facial reduction is then a popular technique whereby SDP problems that fail strict feasibility can be regularized by projecting onto a face of the convex cone of semi-definite problems. In this paper we introduce a framework for combining facial reduction with such SDP methods for analyzing $0$ and positive dimensional real ideals of real polynomial systems. The SDP methods are implemented in MATLAB and our geometric involutive form is implemented in Maple. We use two approaches to find a feasible moment matrix. We use an interior point method within the CVX package for MATLAB and also the Douglas-Rachford (DR) projection-reflection method. Illustrative examples show the advantages of the DR approach for some problems over standard interior point methods. We also see the advantage of facial reduction both in regularizing the problem and also in reducing the dimension of the moment matrices. Problems requiring more than one facial reduction are also presented.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.