Paper detail

$f(R,{T_{μν} T^{μν}})$ gravity and Cardassian-like expansion as one of its consequences

We propose a new model of gravity where the Ricci scalar (R) in Einstein-Hilbert action is replaced by an arbitrary function of R and of the norm of energy-momentum tensor i.e., $f(R,T_{μν}T^{μν})$. Field equations are derived in the metric formalism. We find that the equation of motion of massive test particles is non-geodesic and these test particles are acted upon by a force which is orthogonal to the four-velocity of the particles. We also find the Newtonian limit of the model to calculate the extra acceleration which can affect the perihelion of Mercury. There is a deviation from the general relativistic(GR) result unless the energy density of fluid is constant. Arranging $α$ parameter gives an opportunity to cure the inconsistency between the observational values for the abundance of light elements and the standard Big Bang Nucleosynthesis results. Even the dust dominated universe undergoes an accelerated expansion without using a cosmological constant in Model II. With this specific choice of $f(R,T_{μν}T^{μν})$, we get the a Cardassian-like expansion.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.