Paper detail

F. John's stability conditions vs. A. Carasso's SECB constraint for backward parabolic problems

In order to solve backward parabolic problems F. John [{\it Comm. Pure. Appl. Math.} (1960)] introduced the two constraints "$\|u(T)\|\le M$" and $\|u(0) - g \| \le δ$ where $u(t)$ satisfies the backward heat equation for $t\in(0,T)$ with the initial data $u(0).$ The {\it slow-evolution-from-the-continuation-boundary} (SECB) constraint has been introduced by A. Carasso in [{\it SIAM J. Numer. Anal.} (1994)] to attain continuous dependence on data for backward parabolic problems even at the continuation boundary $t=T$. The additional "SECB constraint" guarantees a significant improvement in stability up to $t=T.$ In this paper we prove that the same type of stability can be obtained by using only two constraints among the three. More precisely, we show that the a priori boundedness condition $\|u(T)\|\le M$ is redundant. This implies that the Carasso's SECB condition can be used to replace the a priori boundedness condition of F. John with an improved stability estimate. Also a new class of regularized solutions is introduced for backward parabolic problems with an SECB constraint. The new regularized solutions are optimally stable and we also provide a constructive scheme to compute. Finally numerical examples are provided.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.