Paper detail

$F$-factors in hypergraphs via absorption

Given integers $ n \ge k >l \ge 1 $ and a $k$-graph $F$ with $|V(F)|$ divisible by $n$, define $t_l^k(n,F)$ to be the smallest integer $d$ such that every $k$-graph $H$ of order $n$ with minimum $l$-degree $δ_l(H) \ge d $ contains an $F$-factor. A classical theorem of Hajnal and Szemerédi implies that $t^2_1(n,K_t) = (1-1/t)n$ for integers $t$. For $k \ge 3$, $t^k_{k-1}(n,K_k^k)$ (the $δ_{k-1}(H)$ threshold for perfect matchings) has been determined by Kühn and Osthus (asymptotically) and Rödl, Ruciński and Szemerédi (exactly) for large $n$. In this paper, we generalise the absorption technique of Rödl, Ruciński and Szemerédi to $F$-factors. We determine the asymptotic values of $t^k_1(n,K_k^k(m))$ for $k = 3,4$ and $m \ge 1$. In addition, we show that for $t>k = 3$ and $γ>0$, $ t^3_{2}(n,K_t^3) \le (1- \frac{2}{t^2-3t+4} + γ) n$ provided $n$ is large and $t | n$. We also bound $t^3_{2}(n,K_t^3)$ from below. In particular, we deduce that $t^3_2(n,K_4^3) = (3/4+o(1))n$ answering a question of Pikhurko. In addition, we prove that $t^k_{k-1}(n,K_t^k) \le (1- \binom{t-1}{k-1}^{-1} + γ)n$ for $γ>0$, $k \ge 6$ and $t \ge (3+ \sqrt5)k/2$ provided $n$ is large and $t | n$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.