Paper detail

Extremely energetic supernova explosions embedded in a massive circumstellar medium: the case of SN 2016aps

We perform one-dimensional radiation-hydrodynamic simulations of energetic supernova ejecta colliding with a massive circumstellar medium (CSM) aiming at explaining SN 2016aps, likely the brightest supernova observed to date. SN 2016aps was a superluminous Type-IIn SN, which released as much as $\gtrsim 5\times 10^{51}$ erg of thermal radiation. Our results suggest that the multi-band light curve of SN 2016aps is well explained by the collision of a $30\ M_\odot$ SN ejecta with the explosion energy of $10^{52}$ erg and a $\simeq 8\ M_\odot$ wind-like CSM with the outer radius of $10^{16}$ cm, i.e., a hypernova explosion embedded in a massive CSM. This finding indicates that very massive stars with initial masses larger than $40\ M_\odot$, which supposedly produce highly energetic SNe, occasionally eject their hydrogen-rich envelopes shortly before the core-collapse. We suggest that the pulsational pair-instability SNe may provide a natural explanation for the massive CSM and the energetic explosion. We also provide the relations between the peak luminosity, the radiated energy, and the rise time for interacting SNe with the kinetic energy of $10^{52}$ erg, which can be used for interpreting SN 2016aps-like objects in future surveys.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.