Paper detail

Extreme-mass-ratio burst detection with TianQin

The capture of compact objects by massive black holes in galaxies or dwarf galaxies will generate short gravitational wave signals, called extreme-mass-ratio bursts (EMRBs), before evolving into extreme-mass-ratio inspirals. Their detection will provide an investigation of the black hole properties and shed light on astronomy and astrophysics. In this work, we investigate the detection number of the TianQin observatory on EMRBs. Our result shows that TianQin can detect tens of EMRBs events during its mission lifetime. For those detected events, we use the Fisher information matrix to quantify these uncertainties in the inference of their parameters. We consider the possible network of TianQin+LISA and study how a network can improve parameter estimation. The result shows that, for most sources, the CO mass, the MBH mass, and the MBH spin can be determined with an accuracy of the order $10^{-1}$ and the sky localization can be determined with an accuracy of 10 square degrees. We further explore the gravitational wave background generated by those unsolved EMRBs and conclude that it is about $10^6$ times weaker than TianQin's sensitivity and thus it can be ignored.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.