Paper detail

Extreme giant molecular clouds in the luminous infrared galaxy NGC 3256

(Abridged) We present a cloud decomposition of $^{12}$CO (2--1) observations of the merger and nearest luminous infrared galaxy, NGC 3256. 185 spatially and spectrally resolved clouds are identified across the central $\approx$ 130 kpc$^{2}$ at 90 pc resolution and completeness is estimated. We compare our cloud catalogue from NGC 3256 to ten galaxies observed in the PHANGS-ALMA survey. Distributions in NGC 3256 of cloud velocity dispersions, luminosities, CO-estimated masses, mass surface densities, virial masses, virial parameters, size-linewidth coefficients, and internal turbulent pressures are significantly higher than in the PHANGS-ALMA galaxies. Cloud radii are slightly larger in NGC 3256 and free-fall times are shorter. The distribution of cloud eccentricities in NGC 3256 is indistinguishable from many PHANGS-ALMA galaxies, possibly because the dynamical state of clouds in NGC 3256 is similar to that of nearby spiral galaxies. However, the narrower distribution of virial parameters in NGC 3256 may reflect a narrower range of dynamical states than in PHANGS-ALMA galaxies. No clear picture of cloud alignment is detected, despite the large eccentricities. Correlations between cloud properties point to high external pressures in NGC 3256 keeping clouds bound and collapsing given such high velocity dispersions and star-formation rates. A fit to the cloud mass function gives a high-mass power-law slope of $-2.75^{+0.07}_{-0.01}$, near the average from PHANGS-ALMA galaxies. We also compare our results to a pixel-based analysis of these observations and find molecular-gas properties agree qualitatively, though peak brightness temperatures are somewhat higher and virial parameters and free-fall times are somewhat lower in this cloud-based analysis.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.