Paper detail

Extremal problems on triangle areas in two and three dimensions

The study of extremal problems on triangle areas was initiated in a series of papers by Erdős and Purdy in the early 1970s. In this paper we present new results on such problems, concerning the number of triangles of the same area that are spanned by finite point sets in the plane and in 3-space, and the number of distinct areas determined by the triangles. In the plane, our main result is an $O(n^{44/19}) =O(n^{2.3158})$ upper bound on the number of unit-area triangles spanned by $n$ points, which is the first breakthrough improving the classical bound of $O(n^{7/3})$ from 1992. We also make progress in a number of important special cases: We show that (i) For points in convex position, there exist $n$-element point sets that span $Ω(n\log n)$ triangles of unit area. (ii) The number of triangles of minimum (nonzero) area determined by $n$ points is at most ${2/3}(n^2-n)$; there exist $n$-element point sets (for arbitrarily large $n$) that span $(6/π^2-o(1))n^2$ minimum-area triangles. (iii) The number of acute triangles of minimum area determined by $n$ points is O(n); this is asymptotically tight. (iv) For $n$ points in convex position, the number of triangles of minimum area is O(n); this is asymptotically tight. (v) If no three points are allowed to be collinear, there are $n$-element point sets that span $Ω(n\log n)$ minimum-area triangles (in contrast to (ii), where collinearities are allowed and a quadratic lower bound holds). In 3-space we prove an $O(n^{17/7}β(n))= O(n^{2.4286})$ upper bound on the number of unit-area triangles spanned by $n$ points, where $β(n)$ is an extremely slowly growing function related to the inverse Ackermann function. The best previous bound, $O(n^{8/3})$, is an old result from 1971.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.