Paper detail

Extremal examples of collapsible complexes and random discrete Morse theory

We present extremal constructions connected with the property of simplicial collapsibility. (1) For each $d \ge 2$, there are collapsible (and shellable) simplicial $d$-complexes with only one free face. Also, there are non-evasive $d$-complexes with only two free faces. (Both results are optimal in all dimensions.) (2) Optimal discrete Morse vectors need not be unique. We explicitly construct a contractible, but non-collapsible $3$-dimensional simplicial complex with face vector $f=(106,596,1064,573)$ that admits two distinct optimal discrete Morse vectors, $(1,1,1,0)$ and $(1,0,1,1)$. Indeed, we show that in every dimension $d\geq 3$ there are contractible, non-collapsible simplicial $d$-complexes that have $(1,0,\dots,0,1,1,0)$ and $(1,0,\dots,0,0,1,1)$ as distinct optimal discrete Morse vectors. (3) We give a first explicit example of a (non-PL) $5$-manifold, with face vector $f=(5013,72300,290944,$ $495912,383136,110880)$, that is collapsible but not homeomorphic to a ball. Furthermore, we discuss possible improvements and drawbacks of random approaches to collapsibility and discrete Morse theory. We will introduce randomized versions \texttt{random-lex-first} and \texttt{random-lex-last} of the \texttt{lex-first} and \texttt{lex-last} discrete Morse strategies of \cite{BenedettiLutz2014}, respectively --- and we will see that in many instances the \texttt{random-lex-last} strategy works significantly better than Benedetti--Lutz's (uniform) \texttt{random} strategy. On the theoretical side, we prove that after repeated barycentric subdivisions, the discrete Morse vectors found by randomized algorithms have, on average, an exponential (in the number of barycentric subdivisions) number of critical cells asymptotically almost surely.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.