Paper detail

Extremal entanglement witnesses

We study extremal entanglement witnesses on a bipartite quantum system. We define the cone of witnesses as the dual of the set of separable density matrices, thus $\textrm{Tr}\,Ωρ\geq 0$ when $Ω$ is a witness and $ρ$ a pure product state, $ρ=ψψ^{\dagger}$ with $ψ=ϕ\otimesχ$. The set of witnesses of unit trace is a compact convex set, defined by its extremal points. The expectation value $f(ϕ,χ)=\mathrm{Tr}\,Ωρ$ as a function of $ϕ$ and $χ$ is a nonnegative biquadratic form. Every zero of $f(ϕ,χ)$ imposes real-linear constraints on $f$ and $Ω$. The Hessian matrix at the zero must be nonnegative. Its eigenvectors with zero eigenvalue, if any, we call Hessian zeros. A zero of $f(ϕ,χ)$ is quadratic if it has no Hessian zeros, otherwise it is quartic. We call a witness quadratic if it has only quadratic zeros, and quartic otherwise. We prove that a witness is extremal if and only if no other witness has the same, or a larger, set of zeros and Hessian zeros. A quadratic extremal witness has a minimum number of isolated zeros depending on dimensions. If a witness is not extremal, the constraints defined by its zeros and Hessian zeros determine all directions in which to search for witnesses having more zeros or Hessian zeros. A finite number of iterated searches in random directions lead to an extremal witness which is usually quadratic with the minimum number of zeros. We discuss some topics related to extremal witnesses, in particular the relation between the facial structures of the dual sets of witnesses and separable states. We discuss the relation between extremality and optimality of witnesses, and a conjecture of separability of the structural physical approximation (SPA) of an optimal witness. We discuss how to treat the entanglement witnesses on a complex Hilbert space as witnesses on a real Hilbert space.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.