Paper detail

Extracting Lifestyle Factors for Alzheimer's Disease from Clinical Notes Using Deep Learning with Weak Supervision

Since no effective therapies exist for Alzheimer's disease (AD), prevention has become more critical through lifestyle factor changes and interventions. Analyzing electronic health records (EHR) of patients with AD can help us better understand lifestyle's effect on AD. However, lifestyle information is typically stored in clinical narratives. Thus, the objective of the study was to demonstrate the feasibility of natural language processing (NLP) models to classify lifestyle factors (e.g., physical activity and excessive diet) from clinical texts. We automatically generated labels for the training data by using a rule-based NLP algorithm. We conducted weak supervision for pre-trained Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) models on the weakly labeled training corpus. These models include the BERT base model, PubMedBERT(abstracts + full text), PubMedBERT(only abstracts), Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) BERT, Bio BERT, and Bio-clinical BERT. We performed two case studies: physical activity and excessive diet, in order to validate the effectiveness of BERT models in classifying lifestyle factors for AD. These models were compared on the developed Gold Standard Corpus (GSC) on the two case studies. The PubmedBERT(Abs) model achieved the best performance for physical activity, with its precision, recall, and F-1 scores of 0.96, 0.96, and 0.96, respectively. Regarding classifying excessive diet, the Bio BERT model showed the highest performance with perfect precision, recall, and F-1 scores. The proposed approach leveraging weak supervision could significantly increase the sample size, which is required for training the deep learning models. The study also demonstrates the effectiveness of BERT models for extracting lifestyle factors for Alzheimer's disease from clinical notes.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.