Paper detail

External bias in the model of isolation of communities

We extend a model of community isolation in the d-dimensional lattice onto the case with an imposed imbalance between birth rates of competing communities. We give analytical and numerical evidences that in the asymmetric two-specie model there exists a well defined value of the asymmetry parameter when the emergence of the isolated (blocked) subgroups is the fastest, i.e. the characteristic time tc is minimal. This critical value of the parameter depends only on the lattice dimensionality and is independent from the system size. Similar phenomenon was observed in the multi-specie case with a geometric distribution of the birth rates. We also show that blocked subgroups in the multi-specie case are absent or very rare when either there is a strictly dominant specie that outnumbers the others or when there is a large diversity of species. The number of blocked species of different kinds decreases with the dimension of the multi-specie system.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.